Shares vs Property

Although we all know there's money to be made in the stock market, a lot of people feel more comfortable investing in property. Shares are often seen as arcane and unpredictable, pieces of paper that might vanish mysteriously and never reappear. Property, on the other hand, is tangible and visible. But is property a better investment than the stock market over the long run?

This is not a simple question. For a start, not all properties are created equal – buying the right house at the right price in the right suburb can be very profitable (just like buying a ten-bagger can make you wealthy). Secondly, many people use the house they live in as their benchmark for property performance, but this is misleading in the context of investment properties. (Owning your home is usually a good idea, but more on this later.)

Let's start off with some facts and figures.

 
 
As you can see from the graph on the left, the share market has significantly out-performed property over the last three years – the All Share Index is up 67% as at May 2012, the FNB House Price Index up only 21%. Over the longer term the market has still outperformed property (in spite of the crash of 2008), although less dramatically. Over three years – based on the graphs above – the stock market has delivered about 18% per year and property about 6.5% per year. (This is based on price appreciation alone and ignores dividends on shares and rental income on property at this stage – more on this below.) Over 12 years (since mid-2000) share growth has averaged 13.3% per year, property growth 10.5% per year.

If you'd bought a house for cash in April 2009 for R2 million, it would have been worth around R2.4 million as at May 2012. If you'd put the R2 million into the stock market instead, it was worth more like R3.3 million. Based on the 12-year figures, a R1 million house bought in August 2001 was worth about R3.2 million as at May 2012; a R1 million stock portfolio, on the other hand, had grown to around R4.4 million.

International research confirms that, in general, shares give better returns than property, so the above charts are not an anomaly. But there is an obvious problem with this simple comparison – property is seldom bought for cash. The leverage effect – using debt to finance a property purchase – generally improves the return on investment, making property more attractive than it seems at first glance.

 
Log a call request
 
email us
 
 
Taking all factors into account – the effect of debt-finance (ie, the mortgage bond), possible shortfalls in bond repayments, property rentals, dividends received on shares, transaction costs, property taxes, rent collection costs, rental escalation, maintenance costs, and so on – results in some fairly complex comparative models which we won't go into here. The short answer based on our calculations is that, over the long term, property can match the returns provided by the stock market. It is rare, however, for property investments, over the long term, to perform better than the stock market. The obvious question, therefore, is this: if your

property investment is not going to do better than a share portfolio, is all the hassle associated with property investment really worth it?

If you want to invest successfully in property, you have to follow certain rules:

  1. You must use debt finance – you have to take on a mortgage bond – to get a gearing effect.
  2. You have to hold property for a long time – at least 10 years, often much longer – to get a return that matches shares. This is partly because the transaction costs on property are so high (ie, you need a 10% increase in house prices just to cover your entry and exit costs), and partly because it takes time to reduce debt to a point where it is working in your favour.
  3. You must keep the rental income flowing. If your property stands without a tenant for one or two months a year, on average, it has a surprisingly negative effect on your overall return.
  4. You have to find a property that can give a reasonable gross rental yield – at least 8% per annum in the current market – otherwise the negative cash flow creates a debt burden. Finding properties that command a high enough rental is often easier said than done.

The Pros and Cons of Property and Shares

As we said above, owning your own home is almost always a good idea – assuming you're going to be in the same place for a reasonable length of time – because the rent you would pay elsewhere can go towards your bond repayments. But if you're looking at a second property as an investment, there are a number of things to consider. Given the fact that your property investment is unlikely to do better than a stock portfolio over time, the real question is whether you want to deal with the various complications of property ownership.

Here is a list of things to consider:

  1. As we said, property bought for cash is generally not a great investment. Are you able to get a mortgage bond? Are you happy to shoulder the debt? Bear in mind that if you are unlucky and the property market goes against you, you will still owe the money to the bank. This is the unfortunate position that property investors in America and England found themselves in after the crash of 2008 – property prices fell, many people owed more than there homes were worth, and some couldn't afford the bond repayments.
  2. Dealing with tenants and maintenance issues can be time-consuming and you need to allow for this. By contrast, your share portfolio will never phone you in the middle of the night to report a burst geyser.
  3. The costs associated with property ownership should not be underestimated. The property needs to be insured. Rates and taxes are typically paid by the owner, not the tenant. Maintenance is for the account of the owner – and properties do require maintenance. All of these costs have to be paid before rental income can be applied to bond repayments.
  4. Collecting rent is not always hassle-free. Non-payment and difficulty of ejecting bad tenants is a major problem with property investment, especially (although not exclusively) at the lower end of the market. Collection agencies are a good idea (many real estate companies provide this service), but this will reduce your rental yield by 8% to 10% per annum. Dividends from shares, on the other hands, require no special effort to collect. As a rule, after-tax dividends from value shares are not dissimilar to the net rental yield (after tax and all costs) from property.
  5. Property is illiquid – it's hard to convert property into cash if you need it in a hurry. It can easily take six months from deciding to sell to actually getting your money. Shares, on the other hand, can be converted into cash almost instantly.
  6. The transaction costs on property are very high. In addition to a deposit, you also need between 6% and 8% of the property value available to meet transfer duties, legal costs and other acquisition fees. Shares, on the other hand, can be acquired at well under 1% of capital value.
  7. Property is definitely less volatile than the share market, and this can be an advantage. With both shares and property, however, you never want to be in a position where you are a forced seller. If you do have to sell, you want to be able to sell into a strong market. This means taking a long-term view and not over-exposing yourself. The ever-present danger with property investments is that the debt you take on becomes a problem.

Risks

But the stock market is dangerous, we hear some people say. There is certainly a widespread perception that shares are riskier than property, and this is not without some basis. Share prices can, at times, rise hard and fall fast. But the long-term trend is very steady. There is only one 10-year period in US history that has given negative returns – and that was due to the great crash of 1929. Out of more than a hundred rolling 10-year periods, only four produced no growth (ie, a return close to zero). At least 95% of the time, therefore, any 10-year holding period was going to give you a positive result. Looking at the JSE since 1960 (rolling 10-year periods starting every month end), there is not a single negative return. Assuming the re-investment of dividends, there is in fact only one 10-year period (out of over 500 ten-year spans) which produced less than an 80% return. Over the half century since 1960, there was a 97.6% chance of at least doubling your money over any 10-year period (ie, starting any month since January 1960). More impressively, the average 10-year return over 509 periods, with dividends re-invested, is almost 500%.

In short, the risk of actually losing money in the stock market, over the longer term, is very very low. The risk becomes almost zero if you apply two simple principles: (1) don't buy when the market is over-heated, and (2) apply rand-cost averaging (ie, keep accumulating shares at different price levels, especially when the market is falling).

For the long-term investor in shares, the risk of capital loss is very low and the chances of making a good return are relatively high – especially if you are able to skew your portfolio towards above-average shares. Provided you have a long-term perspective, therefore, the stock market is not the high-risk environment it is often thought to be.

The Magic™ advantage

The facts and figures above amply demonstrate the high gain, low risk position of the typical long-term stock market investor. All of these figures use stock market indices, which show the average performance of the share market. As a private investor – as we explain in another article – you have the advantage of being able to do a little better than the market average, giving you the potential of outstanding returns.

With its intuitive interface and full integration, Magic™ gives you the information you need to find those above-average shares quickly and easily. Put yourself in a position to capitalise on the investment power of the stock market – pick up the phone today and speak to one of our friendly consultants.

Call +27 11 728-5510 now to get started

PS    To find out more about Magic™ solution, click here to get an overview of the complete product range. Or phone +27 11 728-5510 now to arrange a no-obligation demonstration.

PPS  For the record, the risk of losing your money due to fraud in the share market is almost nil. In South Africa, JSE stockbrokers are very strictly regulated and the JSE runs a guarantee fund to protect investors in the event of default. Provided you use a reputable broking firm, money you invest in the JSE is as safe as houses (pun intended).

Log a call request
 
email us